May 2003. Vancouver, B.C.
9.00am May 29th, 2003 at the Sheraton Wall Centre, 1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver
Attendance:
| Doug Stead | President |
| Jeremy Hall | Past President |
| Micki Allen | Administrative Director,KEGS (Morning) |
| Bryan Schreiner | Issues Director |
| Donald James | Financial Director |
| Rene Barendregt | International Director |
| Bob Mummery | Executive Officer |
| Richard Grieve | NRCan ESS |
| Susan Eaton | CSEG |
| Jim Franklin | SEG |
| Mark Fenton | AGSCPG |
| Norman Marcotte | NSERC |
| Teresa Jurewicz | NSERC |
| Howerd Stockford | CIM |
| Mati Raudsepp | MAC |
| John Hogg | CSPG |
| Harvey Thorleifson | GAC |
| Richard Moore | PDAC |
| Joe White | CCCESD |
| George Cavey | CCPG (Morning) |
| Tracy Brennand | CANQUA |
| Ron Clowes | Lithoprobe |
| Apologies | |
| Alan Morgan | CGC Education Director |
1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes of the 109th Council Meeting (previously circulated
and available at http://www.geoscience.ca/minutes/109minottawa.html)
4. Action items from 109th Council Meeting not otherwise covered by item
of agenda.
a. Climate Change (see 11c)
Draft position paper had been produced. Need for standing committee
b. CGS Survey of Member Societies (see 7c.)
Action item completed. Worthwhile exercise
c. Restructuring of CGC Board (see 8)
In progress. Need council participation to be successful
5. Reports from the Board of Directors (tabled or verbal)
a. Presidents Report
The Presidents
Report on CGC activities for 2002-3 was tabled. A PowerPoint
presentation was given entitled “CGC: A Time for ChangeCGC:
A Time for Change”. The
President emphasized the issues facing CGC and Canadian geoscience:
• real need for improvements in communication and public perception of
geoscience
• Must showcase Canadian geoscience innovation both existing and the future
potential
• Must have a broader participation in CGC - industry, government, academia,
and consultants
• Innovation was important if we are to attract young scientists and engineers
in to geoscience professions
• CGC must to be relevant to a changing society.
• CGC should be structured to react more effectively to geoscience issues
•
CGC must explore alternate sources of funding & cost sharing
•
CGC is changing its operational structure towards a smaller board and to
elicit more direct involvement of Council members. Encourage bottom-up
initiatives – not totally Board driven.
• All major groups MUST be represented in CGC (industry, academia, regional
and federal government)
•
A regular “Council of Presidents Meeting ” should be established
(by teleconference if necessary) at least once a year, CGC will setup the
logistics for this initiative.
•
A volunteer Board cannot alone respond to Issues –it requires commitment
from all levels in CGC.
• Continue support of Standing Committees must be maintained. New Standing
Committee are seen as a key role for CGC in promoting communication within
Canadian geoscience and also the government, media and public. Examples
include:-
o Innovations in Geoscience.
o Groundwater
o Climate Change
o Landslides (Natural Hazards)
o Energy
b. Finance Director
The budget and audit were distributed by Don James.
Moved by Jim Franklin and seconded by Mati Raudsepp to accept
budget proposal from Don James
No discussion, motion passed
c. International
Brief verbal report tabled by Rene Barendregt.
d. Issues Director
Brief verbal report tabled by Bryan Schreiner.
• Difficult for Board to respond to Issues, need more participation
from Members, Standing Committee or Workshops
•
Climate Change response from members highlighted our difficulty in responding
to Issues. This was discussed at length and the need for panels of experts/standing
committees to respond to issues suggested.
6. Executive Officer’s Report.
Bob Mummery tabled a written report. Discussion was then undertaken on
the following issues:
a. The Geoscience Summit Meeting, Calgary August 24/25 2002.
b. The CGC Survey of Member Societies.
c. MetaSoft, Big Online, Charitable Status
7. Status of “Geoscience Vision” Document.
Jeremy Hall (Past President) tabled a written document and a verbal presentation.
CGC had undertaken to prepare 3 papers for geoscience vision process
to be published in Geoscience Canada.
a. State of Geoscience in Canada. Published this spring.
b. Needs document, better quantification of contributions, characterization
of topics. Not ready yet
c. Case study of change Not completed yet.
• It was suggested there was a need to reach a broader audience.
• Emphasized that the NSERC re-allocation issues could be addressed
by a strategy developed by a new CGC Standing Committee on Innovation GeoCanada
2000 model for “super” conference
•
GeoCanada 2010 next, need to establish more partnerships
Jim Franklin moved to create a CGC Standing Committee on Innovation in Geoscience (Seconded by Richard Grieve)
8. CGC Standing Committees
a. International
Continental Drilling Program.
A written report was tabled by Jeremy Hall (Past President and Chair ICDP).
b. Sustainable
Mineral Resource Development
A written report was tabled by Jeremy Richards and presented by Jeremy
Hall. The CGC President thanked Jeremy Richards in his absence for his
efforts while chairing this Standing Committee.
c. Future Initiatives
New Standing Committees for Natural Hazards, Groundwater Issues, Climate
Change.
------------------------LUNCH Break---------------------------------------------
9. Discussion of feedback and future possible initiatives.
a. Presidents Meeting
This should involve Presidents, (or in their absence President Elects/Past
Presidents of Member societies, in addition to Industry and Government
geoscience leaders.
Moved by Jim Franklin seconded
by Mati Raudsepp that CGC establish a regular
meeting of Geoscience society presidents (president-elect, president, past
president)
Motion carried
b. Restructuring of CGC
• Must move toward a reduced Board Membership (president, president-elect,
international, finance & education),
•
Need Long Range Business Plan (LRP),
•
Need nomination for President Elect.
•
Need to have different people at the table: high level industry representation
essential.
Considerable discussion was undertaken as to the role of CGC with a realization that this was dependent on the suggested changes and the development of a clear Long range business plan.
As a short term measure it was suggested that one important initiative might be to develop an efficient communication vehicle for the benefit of the Canadian geoscience community. It was stressed that this was merely a small step in the right direction which must be followed by more far –reaching changes proposed.
Motion by Jeremy Hall and seconded by Mati Raudsepp that “CGC
invite sponsoring members to support the creation of a communication
vehicle for
the benefit of the Geoscience community across Canada.”
Motion passed
c. Future CGC Funding Strategy
•
Agreed to put on hold until CGCdevelops a LRP
•
Need funds for newsletter
•
Need to gather info on charitable status
d. Suspension of all but essential operations for 2003-4 and consideration of dissolution of CGC at 2004 AGM if no progress in Council participation/nominations forthcoming
Not discussed with option to table at next meeting if no progress made on initiatives presented.
10. Any other business
Doug Stead officially thanked Jeremy Hall for his dedicated efforts within
the CGC over the past seven years. Council showed its appreciation.
11. Provisional date and location of next meeting
i. November in Ottawa